thcgummy:

image

(via 0x1)

shesnake:

Bong Joon-ho on the specificity and universality of Parasite (2019)

(via punkrockboifriend)

(Source: chansondereste, via plaguegirlfriend)

‘Lying down flat’ as passive resistance in China →

hater-of-terfs:

chiefmuffinmuncher:

qwertybard:

tonyjcrowley:

queeranarchism:

hater-of-terfs:

The answer to most “how would anarchists handle x” questions is “we already are, we just want the cops off our back so we can do it”

#the best one is when statists say ‘but how would anarchists keep fascists from taking over?’ #uhhh the same way we are right now but without getting thrown in jail for it #anarchists do at least ¾ of the stopping fascism that’s happening right now #the better question is how would you do it without us

This is too good for the tags.

How would anarchists stop the systemic and cultural oppression of disabled people, many of whom depend on governmental safety nets and money/supplies etc to survive and not be abused and to literally be allowed to exist? Like, what’s the anarchist version of the ACA and the ADA?

The short answer is mutual aid. A lot of mutual aid networks existed prior to the pandemic, but they’ve become more widespread recently - and a current example of what you’re talking about, ime, is people buying & delivering groceries and supplies for disabled neighbors. Unfortunately, under current US law, anarchists actually have trouble providing more direct aid to legally disabled people - because to maintain their disabled status and government aid, they’re prevented from ever having more than $2,000 in savings or checking accounts, making it very difficult to provide direct financial assistance. I know a lot of mutual aid funds for disabled (and otherwise marginalized) people get around this by allowing people to apply for a specific dollar amount, but again…it’s largely a matter of the law hurting as much as, or more than, it helps.

A hypothetical anarchist society would like…probably not have money, but include provisions for disabled folks in their constitution & make accomodations for their participation in governance. The goal is to build a society that is free from unjust hierarchies & can provide for everyone’s needs, and the needs of disabled people are included in that.

It would also be much easier for disabled folks to figure out work they are not just capable of doing, but could thrive doing, in a society where labor isn’t coerced via capital - to use myself as an example, my ADHD means I thrive in outdoor rec & outdoor, but most of the current jobs in those fields that exist year-round and pay a living wage are either impossibly competitive or require a level of administrative workload my brain Cannot Handle. If my basic needs were provided for, I could offer my skills way more readily (instead of using them in a patchwork of maaaaaaaybe 2-3 months of low-pay labor a year & unpaid “volunteer” labor for events).

I guess the issue I have with anarchism as the solution to the problem of helping the disabled and other low income groups, is that wouldn’t it be more helpful to just get rid of the legislation that hurts, rather than throwing the whole government away.

I absolutely don’t mean any disrespect here, I was there not long ago too - but the problem with liberalism is that it’s based on just wishing really hard and debating with people and hoping that you can change enough minds to win an election and maybe (if your representatives actually go through with their promises and listen to their constituents, and if they aren’t roadblocked by the opposition) implementing a few changes that will stick around until the next guy gets elected and immediately tries to repeal them. On the individual level, all you can do is vote every couple years and argue with people who are already receiving constant media blasts telling them the exact opposite of what you are - and even if you do get them to vote, the rules are already so thoroughly rigged against you that you might still lose even with 3 million more votes

As we’ve been saying all throughout this thread, anarchists are more focused on getting out there and solving problems on their own. When you vote, you’re hoping for a small chance to maybe create a better life for disabled people a few years down the road if you win - but when you do mutual aid, you’re getting groceries to disabled people right now. And all we need to do is keep building up those programs until, one day, they can replace the state entirely

Capitalism will never offer a life of dignity to those who don’t generate it enough profits. We’ll always have a second-class life, dependent on conditional and unreliable assistance behind miles of red tape, if we’re even allowed to survive at all. The ruling class is constantly fighting to make disabled people like us more miserable, more precarious, less of a “burden” - the only reason they don’t succeed is because people fight back, not in the voting booth but directly

Taking care of the sick and disabled is human nature, and has been as long as we‘ve been humans. It’s only through the institutions of competition, isolation, and selfishness that that instinct is partially suppressed. But we can build a world where neighbors help each other just because they care about each other and there’s plenty to go around, where your opportunity to live a good life isn’t reliant to your productivity

(via greebledgoblin)

thegirlthatcriesacademia:

I’ve had so many knives stuck into me. When they hand me a flower, I can’t quite make out what it is. It takes time.

— Charles Bukowski

(via rustedsun)

reylohater:

reylohater:

image

i made this with the image ai generator today with the prompt “sims 1 satan’s hell”. i also generated an image from the prompt “pissing on ronald reagan’s grave” but it was less successful

image

this was the reagan grave piss prompt result. i hate the humanoid figures in it but the toilets superimposed on the grave are great 

(Source: reylohater, via yeeowch)

ultraviolet-divergence:

Nooo, we aren’t living through a new red scare at all

WASHINGTON — Officials in a little-known security unit within the Commerce Department conducted unauthorized surveillance and investigations into the agency’s employees that targeted people of Chinese and Middle Eastern descent, Senate investigators said in a new report.
The report, informed by more than two dozen whistle-blowers and released this week by Senator Roger Wicker of Mississippi, the top Republican on the Commerce Committee, concluded that the Investigations and Threat Management Service functioned for more than a decade as “a rogue, unaccountable police force,” opening thousands of unauthorized investigations into department employees, often for specious reasons.
The unit, an internal security office inside the Commerce Department, became fixated on rooting out foreign espionage, according to the report, resorting to searching employees’ email accounts for certain phrases in Chinese and flagging “ethnic surnames” for background checks through secure intelligence databases. In some cases, its agents would covertly search employees’ offices wearing face masks and gloves, sometimes picking locks to gain entry.

If you’re not familiar with all the functions of the Commerce Department, it houses things like the National Institute of Standards (NIST), the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), and a number of other national scientific organizations that form a backbone of government science and technical decision making. Apparently their internal security became so afraid that their Chinese employees were out to steal American science that they just started breaking into people’s offices and emails with no warrants and no oversight, out of some paranoid intellectual property revanchism.

(via tsvilingloshn)

fluffygif:

Enjoyed the bubble sounds!

(via fishingforcrows)

godtsol:

(Source: nerviovago, via bubbele)